ReviewItalian journal of pediatrics2025
Beckwith-Wiedemann spectrum (BWSp): an update on diagnosis, management, and follow-up from the scientific committee of the Italian BWSp association.
Review in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A novel maternally inherited CDKN1C variant in a familial beckwith-wiedemann syndrome case: expanding the genotype-phenotype spectrum.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Beckwith-Wiedemann spectrum (BWSp) is a congenital imprinting disorder characterized by overgrowth, cancer predisposition, and diverse clinical manifestations, resulting from epigenetic and genetic alterations at chromosome 11p15.5. BWSp represents the most common imprinting disorder, with a prevalence exceeding 1:10,000. The disorder is primarily associated with loss or gain of methylation at imprinting control regions IC2 and IC1, paternal uniparental disomy of 11p15, or pathogenic variants in CDKN1C. Advances in molecular diagnostics have refined genotype-phenotype correlations, improving both clinical management and tumor screening protocols. This review, produced by the Scientific Committee of the Italian BWSp Association (AIBWS), builds upon the 2018 international consensus, incorporating updated scientific evidence up to 2024. The committee critically assessed post-2017 literature using PRISMA and Delphi methodologies to revise ten key topics, including diagnosis and criteria, prenatal testing, molecular testing strategies, tumor surveillance, macroglossia surgery, growth monitoring, limb-length discrepancy, cognitive and psychosocial outcomes, and MLID (multi-locus imprinting disturbances). A major focus is optimizing diagnosis in cases with negative methylation tests on DNA from blood, where somatic mosaicism often necessitates alternative tissue testing. The review emphasizes prenatal diagnosis challenges, recommends including ART-related pregnancies in diagnostic criteria, and proposes a prenatal scoring system. Updated tumor surveillance strategies are presented, including universal α-fetoprotein screening for hepatoblastoma up to 3 years and genotype-based protocols for Wilms tumor. CDKN1C-related neuroblastoma surveillance is also addressed. MLID, often co-occurring with IC2-LoM, is discussed regarding clinical relevance, testing strategies, and implications for recurrence risk, particularly involving maternal-effect gene variants. Orthopedic and surgical management of limb-length discrepancy (LLD) and macroglossia is reviewed, alongside growth chart development and their role in personalized interventions. New findings on cognitive, behavioral, and psychosocial aspects highlight the need for routine screening and supportive care. The transition to adult care remains underexplored, though recommendations include attention to residual pediatric complications, fertility, and potential long-term risks. This review reinforces the importance of a multidisciplinary and personalized approach to BWSp across the lifespan, calling for further research to refine diagnostics, long-term outcomes, and transition models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.