ArticleBMC health services research2025
Sweden's public health response to COVID-19: a qualitative study building on a realist approach.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSweden's healthcare system, known for its equity and efficiency, faced criticism in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic due to its high mortality rate compared to other Nordic countries. This study aims to explore the Swedish public health system's response to emerging respiratory infectious diseases, particularly COVID-19, using a realist approach. It analyzes contextual factors, interventions, mechanisms, and outcomes to provide a comprehensive understanding of the response, including debates around voluntary versus mandatory measures and the protection of vulnerable groups such as older adults.
objectiveTo explore how and why Sweden's socio-political and healthcare context influenced the interventions employed and their acceptability at both individual and collective levels.
methodsA realist approach was employed, combining qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 11 public health experts, including researchers and infectious disease specialists. Data were analyzed using both deductive and inductive approaches and interpreted through the Context-Intervention-Mechanism-Outcome (CIMO) framework.
resultsKey contextual factors included high trust in authorities, political decentralization, and the structure of the healthcare system. Notable interventions involved targeted vaccination campaigns, recruitment of retired healthcare workers, and increased digitalization. Mechanisms driving outcomes included trust, acceptance, and stakeholder engagement, which facilitated adaptation and acceptability of interventions. Interviewees highlighted challenges related to the timing and adequacy of measures, particularly for older adults in long-term care.
conclusionWhile Sweden's public health response was effective in several areas, it faced challenges due to decentralization, voluntary non-pharmaceutical interventions, and workforce burnout. The realist approach highlights the importance of context-sensitive mechanisms such as trust and cooperation, and the need for stronger coordination and tailored strategies for vulnerable populations. These findings provide valuable insights for strengthening public health systems and pandemic preparedness globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.