ArticleBMC medical education2025
Development and pilot evaluation of a structured curriculum for surgical handover.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEffective handover communication is a core professional competency in graduate medical education, yet very few junior doctors working in surgery receive formal training. A structured curriculum was developed and piloted to teach best practices in surgical handover, based on a recognised curricular framework.
methodsThe study was carried out at two academic tertiary hospitals in Dublin, Ireland. Interns attending mandatory weekly teaching sessions participated in a 60-minute intervention combining didactic teaching, video demonstration, small group simulation, and facilitated discussion. Self-reported confidence in delivering and participating in handover was assessed using pre- and post-session surveys. Post-session feedback on curriculum content and format was also collected.
resultsA total of 59 interns attended the teaching sessions, with 35 providing paired pre- and post-session data. Self-reported confidence significantly improved across all assessed domains assessed (p<0.001), including confidence in handing over to peers and senior colleagues, asking clarifying questions during handover, and providing a summary or 'readback' at the end of handover. Feedback from 46 participants indicated that the session was well-received, with video demonstrations and simulated practice rated most helpful. Didactic teaching and peer feedback were rated least helpful. A majority (76.1%; n=35) reported that the session would lead to changes in their handover practice.
conclusionsThis pilot study showed that a simulation-based curriculum is effective in improving interns' self-reported confidence in delivering and receiving surgical handover. The teaching session was well-received, easily integrated into existing institutional infrastructure, and required minimal resources to carry out.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.