ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Evaluating the impact of physical activity cards (PACs) on motor proficiency and enjoyment of physical activities among primary school students in Turkey.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study delved into the potential of the Physical Activity Cards (PAC) program to enhance primary school students' motor skills and enjoyment of physical activities. The study, conducted in a rural state school, used purposive sampling to select participants. Classroom teacher interviews revealed a need for more PAC usage in physical education and play lessons. Consequently, all third-grade sections from the selected school were included in the study, with 92 students voluntarily participating. Two actively licensed athletes were excluded, leaving a final sample of 49 girls and 43 boys. Using the Test of Gross Motor Development Second Edition (TGMD-2) and the Enjoyment of Physical Activities Scale (PACES), data were collected from 92 students. Results indicated significant improvements in both motor proficiency and enjoyment levels post-intervention. Specifically, the mean scores for motor proficiency increased from 44.77 to 55.02 and for enjoyment, from 37.55 to 47.35. These findings suggest that the PAC program can effectively enhance motor skills and enjoyment of physical activities among primary school students. The study confirmed that PACs improve motor proficiency and affect students' enjoyment positively. This study underscores the potential of school-based interventions to enhance children's motor proficiency and enjoyment of physical activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.