ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Autheem therapy for young Saudi infants: the whys and the impacts.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Saudi Arabia, primigravida or multigravida mothers might seek complementary medicine for their infants. When an infant struggles with colic or poor feeding, a mother will do anything to help her baby including traditional therapy. Traditional healers use a maneuver called "Autheem- عظيم" based on a common belief among the Saudi public of needing to manipulate soft palates for struggling infants. METHODOLOGY: This study is a retrospective cohort study adopted to recruit children at the age of 36 months who underwent "Autheem" therapy and those who did not as controls. Mothers in the waiting area at the general pediatrics clinics in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia were approached to answer a pre-structured survey. The "Ages and Stages Questionnaire" study tool was used to assess their children's development.
resultsThe study enrolled 84 well-educated mothers (74% with college degrees in the control group and 58.5% in the study group). The main sources of information about Autheem and its indications were grandmothers and family elders. Poor feeding followed by responding to grandmothers' pressure were the main reasons to seek this therapy. The majority of mothers (71%) admitted that if they found a solution in modern medicine, they would not have explored this therapy. Mothers noted that most healers do not wash their hands. Over one-third of mothers (36.6%) documented lethargy in the first 24 h post-therapy. One in five mothers was offered cautery therapy at the time of Autheem therapy. There was a significant difference in development between children exposed to Autheem therapy in comparison to healthy controls. Autheem exposed children were 10 times more likely to be delayed in gross motor skills. Furthermore, notable delay was documented in fine motor and problem solving despite lack of statistical significance.
conclusionConcern about infant feeding is the main reason for seeking "Autheem." The association of developmental delays might indicate safety concerns of this therapy on growing brains. Future advocacy should focus on elders in the family to avoid Autheem therapy until better safety data is available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.