ArticleBMC cancer2025
Molecular predictors of treatment resistance and recurrence following neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beta-site Amyloid Precursor Protein Cleaving Enzyme 1 Overexpression Abrogates ST6GAL1 Mediated Rectal Cancer Chemoradiation Resistance.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, but only 20–40% of patients completely respond to this treatment. Pre-treatment predictors of response are understudied. To define the molecular features that are associated with response to nCRT, we compared genomic and transcriptomic data from 318 pre-treatment biopsies of microsatellite stable rectal cancers from our own data and from publicly available data. We found that patients with a complete response have decreased risk of both local recurrence and future metastasis. We identified multiple differences in DNA mutations and transcripts between complete and incomplete responders. Different genes contained significantly co-occurring and mutually exclusive mutations between CR and ICR tumors. In addition, complete responders had lower expression of genes enriched with multiple mechanisms of DNA repair indicating that defective DNA repair may be associated with complete response to nCRT. We developed a logistic regression model adjusted for tumor size, stage, and age to determine the relationship co-occurring mutations and tumor complete response and found that the number of certain co-occurring mutations to be highly predictive of CR. When we assessed for predictors of recurrence in incomplete responder tumors, abnormal cell–cell interaction and increased cancer associated fibroblasts were associated with recurrence. Additionally, gene expression analysis identified a subset of immune hot tumors with worse outcomes and upregulation of immune checkpoint proteins. These data provide additional understanding of the molecular features associated with response to nCRT and the underlying molecular differences in responders and non-responders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.