Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41126099›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2025

A robust and data-efficient deep learning model for cardiac assessment without segmentation.

Conor M Artman, Ricardo Henao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Conor M ArtmanAI Research Group, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA. artman1@llnl.gov.
Ricardo HenaoDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, 2424 Erwin Road Suite 1104, Durham, 27705, NC, USA. ricardo.henao@duke.edu.

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS T32-HL079896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Video-based deep learning (DL) algorithms often rely on segmentation models to detect clinically important features in transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs). While effective, these algorithms can be too data hungry for practice and may be sensitive to common data quality issues. To overcome these concerns, we present a data-efficient DL algorithm, Scaled Gumbel Softmax (SGS) EchoNet, that is robust to these common data quality issues and, importantly, requires no ventricular segmentation model. In lieu of a segmentation model, we decompose and transform the output of an R(2 + 1)D convolutional encoder to estimate frame-level weights associated with the cardiac cycle, that are then used to obtain a video representation that can be used for estimation. We find that our transformation obviates the need for a segmentation model while improving the ability of the predictive model to handle noisy inputs. We show that our model achieves comparable performance to the state of the art, while demonstrating robustness to noise on an independent (external) validation set.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEchocardiographyImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansCardiac assessmentClinical decision supportComputer visionRobust deep learningUltrasounds

Identifiers

PMID41126099
PMCPMC12541996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.