ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
A cross-sectional evaluation of rational antibiotic prescribing in Kabul based on WHO indicators.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- One Health Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in the Eastern Mediterranean: The Blackchin Guitarfish as a Case Study.GeoHealth · 2026Article
- ESKAPE pathogens and their antimicrobial resistance patterns at the university teaching hospital of Kigali, Rwanda: a five -year analysis (2020-2024).Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInappropriate antibiotic use is a major driver of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), particularly in low- and middle-income countries. To improve rational prescribing, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed core prescribing indicators and the AWaRe antibiotic classification. Evidence from Afghanistan remains scarce, especially in outpatient settings.
methodsThis cross-sectional prescription audit was conducted from June to December 2024 in six public and private hospitals in Kabul. Prescriptions were sampled from outpatient departments of internal medicine, pediatrics, surgery, and ENT. Of 623 prescriptions screened, 306 (49.1%) contained at least one antibiotic and were analyzed using WHO prescribing indicators and the AWaRe classification. Data were processed with SPSS v25.
resultsA total of 374 antibiotics were prescribed, with an average of 1.5 per prescription. The most common agents were ceftriaxone (19.9%), metronidazole (16.0%), ciprofloxacin (12.4%), and amoxicillin (11.4%). Generic prescribing accounted for 63.3%, while 42.7% of prescriptions included parenteral antibiotics. All antibiotics were from the National Essential Medicines List. AWaRe analysis showed Watch antibiotics (58.6%) predominated, while Access antibiotics (41.4%) were underused; no Reserve antibiotics were prescribed. No culture and sensitivity testing supported prescribing.
conclusionAntibiotic prescribing in Kabul outpatient settings substantially exceeded WHO standards, with high reliance on broad-spectrum Watch-group agents, injectables, and non-generic formulations. These findings underscore the urgent need for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs, prescriber training, and improved diagnostic capacity to ensure rational antibiotic use and contain AMR in Afghanistan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.