Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41126088›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2025

A systematic literature review on mammography: deep learning techniques for breast cancer detection with global and Asian perspectives.

Ashwini Amin, Dinesh Acharya U, Prakashini Koteshwara, Siddalingaswamy P C, Stanley Mathew

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ashwini AminManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.
Dinesh Acharya UManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India. dinesh.acharya@manipal.edu.
Prakashini KoteshwaraDepartment of Radio Diagnosis, Kasturba Medical Hospital, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.
Siddalingaswamy P CManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.
Stanley MathewDepartment of Surgery, Kasturba Medical Hospital, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreast cancer remains a leading cause of mortality in women worldwide, with notable disparities in incidence and prognosis across regions. This systematic review explores the application of Deep Learning-based computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) systems for breast cancer detection, with a special focus on Asia to highlight underrepresented perspectives and challenges.

methodsWe conducted a systematic Literature review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of Scopus and Web of Science databases was performed to identify relevant studies published between January 2018 and November 2023, with an additional hand search for recent studies from 2024 to 2025. After screening 1051 records, 287 articles were included based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality assessment focused on the relevance of deep learning-based approaches to mammographic breast cancer detection, emphasizing global research trends and focused analysis of studies involving Asian populations.

resultsThe review identified major research trends in deep learning-based mammographic analysis, with most studies focusing on lesion classification while comparatively fewer addressed detection, segmentation, and breast density assessment. Studies using Asian datasets revealed unique challenges, including higher breast density, limited annotations, and under-representation in public datasets. Analysis of methodologies highlighted varied use of image preprocessing and augmentation techniques. Focus maps were used to visualize contributions across tasks and populations, revealing gaps in multi-class BI-RADS classification and a global research bias toward Caucasian datasets (> 80%).

conclusionThis review reveals that most deep learning models for breast cancer detection are trained predominantly on Caucasian datasets, creating significant limitations when applied to other populations due to demographic differences in breast density and imaging characteristics. To improve breast cancer screening globally, researchers must develop deep learning systems using diverse datasets that represent different populations, validate these models across various ethnic groups, and ensure clinical testing includes women from multiple demographic backgrounds. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD 42,023,478,896.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningMammographyAsiaAsian PeopleDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansArtificial intelligenceAsianBreast cancerDeep learningGlobal trendMammogramsMammographySystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID41126088
PMCPMC12542462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.