ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Enhanced diagnosis of osteoporosis using vision transformer with lumbar MRI.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteoporosis (OP), characterized by bone mineral density (BMD) loss and microstructural deterioration, remains underdiagnosed due to the limitations of conventional methods (DXA/QCT). Early and accurate diagnosis of OP is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies and improving prognosis.
objectiveTo develop and validate a predictive model integrating clinical data, MRI radiomics, and Vision Transformer (ViT) features for enhanced diagnosis and risk assessment of OP.
methodsThis retrospective dual-center study enrolled 1,095 patients with chronic low back pain (median age: 69 years; 60% female). We developed a 3D ViT model using combined T1WI and T2WI lumbar MRI, simultaneously extracting ViT-based deep features and radiomic features from segmented L1-L3 vertebrae. Feature selection was performed using t-test and LASSO regression. Logistic regression classifiers were constructed to compare standalone ViT and radiomics models, followed by an integrated model incorporating clinical variables, radiomic features, and ViT features. Model performance was assessed using AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, precision, confusion matrices, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Interpretability was achieved through clinical nomogram and SHAP visualization.
resultsAmong 1,095 patients (age 69[9] years; 657 [60%] female), age and gender emerged as clinical risk factors. The MRI-based ViT model achieved higher AUCs than the radiomics model in both internal (0.844 vs. 0.697) and external (0.745 vs. 0.654) test sets. The combined model demonstrated superior performance with AUCs of 0.855 (internal) and 0.806 (external).
conclusionThe combined model significantly improves OP diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility, with ViT features critically enhancing predictive performance, establishing a promising tool for OP diagnosis and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.