ArticleBMC genomics2025
Genome-wide association study and genomic selection for growth-related traits in Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica).
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Candidate SNPs and Genes Associated with Body Weight in the Northern Snakehead (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Range-Wide Genetic Population Structure and Environmental Adaptation in the Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica) Provides Insight for Aquaculture.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of genomic selection to improve survival of eastern oysters infected withFrontiers in genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the genetic architecture of economically important traits is essential for the design and implementation of efficient breeding programs. Here, we analysed 3,653 Eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) from 62 crossing groups and 307 full-sib families, all genotyped with a 200 K SNP array, to (i) estimate heritability and genetic correlations for six growth-related traits, (ii) detect quantitative trait loci (QTL) and candidate genes, and (iii) compare the accuracy of pedigree- (PBLUP) versus genomic-based (GBLUP) predictions across marker densities, selection strategies (physical distance (PD) versus linkage disequilibrium (LD) and phenotype-based genotyping strategies. SNP-based Heritabilities ranged from 0.33 to 0.56, and genetic correlations among traits exceeded 0.61, indicating strong pleiotropy. GWAS revealed a polygenic architecture with a shared QTL on chromosome 2; the top SNP explained ≤ 1.1% of phenotypic variance. Except for the 0.5 K LD panel-where PBLUP was more accurate-and the 1 K LD panel-where both methods performed similarly-GBLUP outperformed PBLUP in all scenarios, with the greatest advantage observed for physically spaced (PD) panels. The highest accuracy (0.80) was achieved with the full 100 K SNP set. GBLUP models required panels containing ≥ 0.5 K PD (accuracy ≥ 0.55) or ≥ 2 K LD (accuracy ≥ 0.56) to significatively surpass PBLUP predictions. Training sets built from extreme phenotypes boosted accuracy in small to intermediate sample sizes (e.g., 0.74 at n = 1,500 with 5 K PD SNPs versus 0.53 under random sampling). These results provide novel insights into not only the genomic regions controlling growth in this species but also about the utility of PD-based SNP panels and balanced sampling designs for enhancing GS accuracy in C. virginica.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.