Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41126044›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

The cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) mitochondrial genome: intraspecific structural variation, repetitive architecture, and comparative evolutionary dynamics.

Kewei You, Jiali Kong, Xiaolin Gu, Liyun Nie, Junhu Kan, Jie Wang, Yanghe Zhao, Shuo Zhang, Luke R Tembrock, Shengnan Lin and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. TheGenes · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kewei You *State Key Laboratory for Crop Stress Resistance and High-Efficiency Production, College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China.
Jiali Kong *Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, Guangdong, China.
Xiaolin Gu *Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, Guangdong, China.
Liyun Nie *Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, Guangdong, China.
Junhu Kan *Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, Guangdong, China.
Jie WangShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, Guangdong, China.
Yanghe ZhaoShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, Guangdong, China.
Shuo ZhangShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, Guangdong, China.
Luke R TembrockDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Shengnan LinShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, Guangdong, China.
Xiping WangState Key Laboratory for Crop Stress Resistance and High-Efficiency Production, College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China. wangxiping@nwsuaf.edu.cn.
Minlong JiaShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, 518120, Guangdong, China. yysjml@163.com.
Zhiqiang WuState Key Laboratory for Crop Stress Resistance and High-Efficiency Production, College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China. wuzhiqiang@caas.cn.

Funding

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Elite Youth Program 110243160001007Guangdong Pearl River Talent Program 2021QN02N792National Natural Science Foundation of China 32170238Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program JCYJ20220818103212025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMitochondria are essential organelles with complex mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes) that challenge conventional assembly and analysis. Compared to plastid and nuclear genomes, plant mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes) exhibit immense structural complexity and low nucleotide substitution rates. Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) is a vital crop and a key model for studying its rare paternal mitogenome inheritance. However, a comprehensive understanding of intraspecific mitogenomic diversity in cucumber has been hindered by the limitations of short-read sequencing, which fails to resolve its complex, repeat-rich architecture.

resultsHere, by leveraging long-read sequencing, we assembled the complete mitogenomes of 12 diverse cucumber accessions. The assemblies revealed massive mitogenomes (1.49-1.61 Mb) with highly reticulate, graph-based structures, moving beyond the simplistic"master-circle" model. We discovered that this profound structural diversity is driven by a small number of large, recombinationally active repeats, which allowed us to classify the mitogenomes into six distinct structural types. Phylogenetic analyses of the plastid (maternal) and mitochondrial (paternal) genomes revealed strikingly discordant evolutionary histories, reflecting their different inheritance modes and evolutionary rates. Analysis of intracellular DNA transfer showed that mitochondrial-to-nuclear transfers (NUMTs) have declined over evolutionary time, whereas plastid-to-nuclear transfers (NUPTs) are more recent and ongoing. Furthermore, the synonymous substitution rate in cucumber mitogenomes was 8-10 times lower than in plastomes, underscoring their extreme sequence conservation.

conclusionsOur study demonstrates that cucumber mitogenomes are not static but are highly dynamic mosaics shaped by repeat-mediated recombination, resulting in extensive structural variation even within a single species. These findings highlight the power of long-read assembly for studying complex organellar genomes and establish the paternally inherited mitogenome as a valuable resource for tracing paternal lineages and developing novel strategies for crop improvement.

Indexed as

Cucumis sativusEvolution, MolecularGenome, MitochondrialGenetic VariationGenome, PlantPhylogenyRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidCucumberGenome structureIntracellular transfersMitogenomePlastomeRepetitive sequences

Identifiers

PMID41126044
PMCPMC12542108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.