ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025
Comparison of systemic inflammatory markers in total knee arthroplasty under spinal vs general anesthesia: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early systemic inflammatory indices and postoperative SIRS after percutaneous nephrolithotomy under spinal versus general anaesthesia: a prospective cohort study.BMC urology · 2026Observational
- Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty and systemic inflammation: a retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn total knee arthroplasty (TKA), both surgical trauma and the type of anesthesia administered can significantly affect systemic inflammation, which may influence postoperative recovery. This retrospective study aimed to compare perioperative changes in blood-derived systemic inflammatory markers-specifically the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI)-in patients undergoing TKA under general versus spinal anesthesia.
methodsThis retrospective analysis included 849 patients who underwent elective primary TKA between January 2020 and April 2025. Inclusion criteria were age 18-75 years and ASA physical status I-II. Patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m², ASA ≥ III, major comorbidities, active infection, revision surgery, or incomplete lab data were excluded. Patients were categorized into spinal anesthesia (Group S) and general anesthesia (Group G) groups. Pre- and postoperative hemograms were used to calculate SII and SIRI values; ΔSII and ΔSIRI were defined as absolute differences. Groups were compared in terms of inflammatory markers, total opioid requirement, postoperative complications, and hospital stay. Group comparability regarding age, ASA, and comorbidities was assessed, and multivariate linear regression models were applied to evaluate predictors of ΔSII and ΔSIRI.
resultsA total of 849 patients were included in the study. The median ΔSII value was significantly higher in the general anesthesia group [Group G: 1448.47 (IQR: 677.78-2670.86)] compared to the spinal anesthesia group [Group S: 1060.75 (IQR: 463.69-2093.28); p < 0.001]. Similarly, the ΔSIRI value was higher in Group G [4.56 (IQR: 2.31-9.23)] than in Group S [3.69 (IQR: 1.70-7.05); p = 0.002]. The total opioid requirement within the first 24 postoperative hours was also significantly greater in Group G (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of postoperative complication rates (p = 0.48) or length of hospital stay (p = 0.18).
conclusionCompared to general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia was associated with a lower postoperative increase in systemic inflammatory blood markers in patients undergoing TKA. While no difference was observed in short-term clinical outcomes, these findings suggest that spinal anesthesia may offer an immunological advantage. Given the retrospective nature of the study, prospective research is warranted to determine whether these biomarker differences have meaningful clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.