ArticlePediatric research2026
Enhancing neonatal vascular access: proposing a patient-centered framework based on 7-Rights.
Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The applications, complications, and management of neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters (n-PICCs): a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal vascular access (VA) is a critical component of neonatal intensive care. However, VA remains a high-risk procedure associated with pain and serious complications. Despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines, variability in practice persists, leading to inconsistent patient outcomes. A standardized, patient-centered approach could enhance patient safety, experience, and outcomes. The '7-Rights Framework for Neonatal VA' emerged through international expert consensus. This framework uses the concept of patient rights, the '7-Rights' - Right Patient, Right Care Team, Right Comfort Measures, Right VA Device, Right Blood Vessel, Right Care of the Infusion and Device, and Right Therapy Duration and Device Removal to integrate best evidence-based practice, ethical considerations, and family involvement. Recognizing the need for a standardized approach to VA and simultaneously considering individual needs, the framework readily provides guiding principles for developing individualized Vascular Access Management Plans (VAMP). In addition to proposing the 7-Rights framework, this article advocates for its operationalization in a VAMP that encompasses the entire VA process, from planning, device selection, insertion, maintenance, monitoring, and quality control. A VAMP based on the 7-Rights framework has the potential to individualize VA care, improve consistency, enhance patient safety, and facilitate quality improvement initiatives. IMPACT: Key message Introduces the 7-Rights Framework as a structured, patient-centered model to guide neonatal vascular access (VA) decisions. What it adds Translates human rights principles into clinical VA practice, integrating ethical standards and family involvement. Proposes the use of individualized Vascular Access Management Plans (VAMPs) to operationalize the framework. Impact Addresses current gaps in standardization, safety, and consistency across NICUs. Provides a universal guide to support clinicians in reducing complications and improving neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41125962What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.