ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Advanced chronic kidney disease increases the odds of ERCP adverse events but not post-ERCP pancreatitis: a propensity-matched analysis of the US Collaborative Network.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at an increased risk choledocholithiasis, requiring intervention with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Data on ERCP-related adverse events in this population is limited, hence this study.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX database to assess the odds of ERCP-related adverse events in patients with stages 4 and 5 chronic kidney disease, as well as end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis. Primary outcomes were ERCP-related pancreatitis (PEP), bleeding, cholangitis, and perforation. Secondary outcomes were failure to extubate/new post-procedure intubation, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and all-cause mortality.
resultsAfter propensity score matching, our study included 4450 patients in the aCKD cohort and 4450 patients in the matched control cohort who underwent ERCP. Patients with aCKD had an increased odds of bleeding (OR 2.1, p < 0.001), cholangitis (OR 1.6, p < 0.001), ICU admissions (OR 2.2, p < 0.001), intubation (OR 3.0, p < 0.001) and mortality (OR 1.8, p < 0.001) compared to those with normal renal function. The odds of PEP (OR 1.1, p = 0.542) and perforation (OR 1.3, p = 0.528) were statistically similar between the two cohorts. No subgroup differences in ERCP-related AE were found except for increased ICU admissions odds in ESRD patients.
conclusionaCKD patients are a demonstrably high-risk group for certain ERCP-related AEs but not for PEP or perforation, a finding that may change the previous widespread perception of increased PEP risk in this population. Additional studies are needed to validate our findings and investigate potential interventions to improve clinical outcomes in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.