ReviewPlant molecular biology2025
Harnessing multi-omics and genome-editing technologies for climate-resilient agriculture: bridging AI-driven insights with sustainable crop improvement.
Review in Plant molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant defence priming and memory mechanisms under climate change.Essays in biochemistry · 2026Review
- Review
- Multi-Omics Dissection of Drought Stress Responses in Crops: From Molecular Regulatory Networks to Climate-Resilient Breeding Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Beyond static snapshots: predicting dynamic, explainable intermediate phenotypes for climate-resilient crop breeding.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Bridging scales: integrated multi-omics and deep phenotyping for climate resilience in crop plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Modern genomic and omics-based technologies for millet breeding and genetic improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Environmental challenges such as drought, salinity, heavy metal contamination, and nutrient deficiencies threaten global agricultural productivity and food security. These stressors drastically reduce crop yields, necessitating innovative solutions. Recent advancements in omics-based research-spanning genomics, metabolomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, and phenomics-have transformed our understanding of plant stress responses at the molecular level. High-throughput sequencing, mass spectrometry, and computational biology have facilitated the identification of stress-responsive genes, proteins, and metabolites critical for enhancing plant resilience. This review evaluates omics-driven strategies for improving crop performance under environmental stress. It emphasizes multi-omics data integration, precision breeding, artificial intelligence (AI) in crop modeling, and genome-editing technologies. Notably, breakthroughs in machine learning and AI have refined predictive modeling, enabling precise selection of stress-tolerant traits and optimizing breeding strategies. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including the complexity of multi-omics data analysis, high technology costs, and regulatory barriers. Bridging the gap between research and practical applications requires developing cost-effective platforms, enhancing AI-driven models, and conducting large-scale field validations. This review highlights the transformative potential of omics technologies to develop climate-resilient crops. By integrating these advanced methodologies, agriculture can achieve sustainable food production and bolster global food security in the face of climate change and environmental stressors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41125905What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.