ArticlePituitary2025
Less invasive skull base reconstruction using gelatin sponge and collagen matrix to prevent cerebrospinal fluid leakage after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery: experience in 558 cases.
Article in Pituitary, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experimental and Clinical Evaluation of Spongostan as a Substitute for Spongel in Sellar Floor Reconstruction during Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe evaluated the effectiveness of a less invasive skull base reconstruction technique using a fibrin glue-soaked gelatin sponge (FGGS) and collagen matrix to prevent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage following endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS). This approach minimizes the need for fascia harvesting and the use of nasoseptal flaps.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 558 ETSS, excluding Rathke's cleft cysts, performed at our institution. Surgeries were classified by intraoperative CSF leakage grade according to Esposito's classification. Patients' characteristics and intraoperative findings were analyzed to assess potential risk factors for postoperative CSF leakage. Postoperative CSF leakage rates were compared between the pre-collagen matrix (428 surgeries) and collagen matrix (130 surgeries) periods.
resultsFGGS-based reconstruction without fat grafts was performed in 73.7% of surgeries, including 99.4% of grade 0 and 88.5% of grade 1 leaks. Nasoseptal flaps were used in only eight surgeries (1.4%), and fascia was not used at all, either for watertight dural suturing or for multilayer reconstruction. The overall postoperative CSF leakage rate was 1.8% (10/558). The leakage rates by intraoperative CSF leak grade were 0%, 1.7%, 5.6%, and 1.1% for grades 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Postoperative CSF leakage was associated with unfamiliar techniques and excessive bucking during extubation. During the collagen matrix period, although 33.8% of surgeries involved grade 3 high-flow CSF leaks, only one surgery (0.8%; 1/130) resulted in postoperative CSF leakage.
conclusionsAs a less invasive technique, skull base reconstruction using FGGS and/or a collagen matrix was effective in reducing postoperative CSF leakage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.