ArticleScientific reports2025
Ensemble learning for enhancing critical infrastructure resilience to urban flooding.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extreme rainfall and flooding severely impact urban systems by disrupting access to critical services, interrupting mobility, and posing challenges for emergency management. Accurate road network flood prediction remains challenging due to complex flow dynamics, coarse-resolution traditional models, and limited data. The main objective of this study is to enhance road-network flood prediction using ensemble machine learning models trained on crowd-sourced flood datasets. Our results for the Washington, D.C. area show that stacked super-ensemble learning improves road flood prediction compared to the voting algorithm and several other base learners, including random forest, support vector machine, bagging, and boosting. Stacking algorithm achieved an accuracy of 0.84, precision of 0.82, and F1-score of 0.82. Shapley additive explanations indicate that elevation strongly influences model prediction accuracy. Stacking ensemble classifies around 5% of road networks as having very high likelihood and 11% as having high likelihood of flooding. We find that over 40% of energy and emergency services are located within high hazard networks. The insights gained from this study can help improve urban flood prediction which is crucial for enhancing community resilience to extreme weather events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.