ArticleScientific reports2025
A new hybrid neural network framework inspired by biological systems for advanced financial forecasting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In contemporary financial markets, accurate risk prediction is critical for market participants. Existing approaches often face limitations in computational efficiency, model complexity, and predictive performance. This study proposes a novel Quantum-Inspired Chimpanzee Optimization Algorithm with Kernel Extreme Learning Machine (QChOA-KELM) for financial risk prediction. The methodology combines quantum computing principles with metaheuristic optimization to enhance the KELM's parameter selection, improving both prediction accuracy and model robustness. Experimental validation using a Kaggle-sourced financial risk dataset demonstrates the model's superior performance: QChOA-KELM achieves a 10.3% accuracy improvement over baseline KELM and outperforms conventional methods by at least 9% across evaluation metrics. The results indicate that our approach provides an effective computational framework for financial risk assessment, offering significant advantages in predictive performance while maintaining computational efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.