ArticleScientific reports2025
Natal and neonatal teeth in newborns and infants: a case-control study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study focused on the clinical characteristics and management of natal and neonatal teeth. It included an interview (questions about birth, parental health, pregnancy) as well as a clinical examination (appearance of teeth according to Hebling's classification and their mobility according to Miller's classification as well the assessment of soft tissues). Of the 52 children, natal teeth were found in 38 (73.8%) and neonatal ones in 14 (26.92%). All those teeth were mandibular central incisors. The crowns were normal (46.5%) and shell-shaped with enamel hypoplasia (20.9%). In 14 (26.9%) patients, 18 (27.9%) teeth showed enamel hypoplasia. 29 (49.1%) natal teeth exhibited excessive mobility (class 3) and were extracted. In 5.7%, a Riga-Fede ulceration was observed. Statistically significant differences between the groups were related to the parent's age and health status, the mother's thyroid diseases or medications taken. Extended gestational period was related to an increased risk of natal tooth development (OR = 1.9975 (1.0221-2.7620); 95% CI: 1.0221-2.7620; p = 0.0093). The observation lasted until the emergence of permanent lower incisors. None of the teeth were extra/supernumerary. Both dentists and paediatricians should be aware of the clinical implications of such teeth. In the absence of indications for extraction, they should be retained. The importance of a comprehensive oral examination of a newborn should be emphasized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.