ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Impact of an Educational Campaign on Public Misconceptions and Knowledge of Common Plastic Surgery Procedures.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe demand for plastic surgery has increased as individuals seek appearance enhancement. However, common misconceptions persist, often exaggerating the risks associated with these procedures. Despite advancements in safety through improved techniques and post-operative care, public knowledge remains limited. This study aims to investigate prevalent misconceptions about common plastic surgery procedures to enhance understanding and support informed decision-making.
methodThis cross-sectional study in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, assessed public knowledge and misconceptions about common plastic surgery procedures through a self-administered survey distributed during an awareness campaign. A sample of 700 participants aged 18-50 was targeted, with responses collected pre- and post-campaign. A matching procedure controlled for demographic differences to ensure comparability between groups. The survey, developed in English and translated into Arabic, was pilot-tested for validity.
resultsAmong 368 participants (184 pre and 184 post-campaign), demographic comparisons showed no significant differences between groups (e.g., gender, age, education, prior cosmetic surgery; all p > 0.05). Post-campaign, correct responses increased substantially: for fillers (irreversibility misconception dropped from 64.7 to 96.2%), silicone implants (safety concern reduced from 32.1 to 89.7%), and rhinoplasty (respiratory issues belief fell from 28.8 to 90.8%; all p < 0.001). Median knowledge scores rose from 7 to 19 (p < 0.001), with strong reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95). Regression indicated reduced demographic disparities post-campaign, showing broad improvement across groups.
conclusionThe awareness campaign effectively improved public knowledge and corrected misconceptions about plastic surgery, reducing knowledge disparities across demographic groups. These findings highlight the impact of targeted educational interventions in promoting informed decision-making regarding cosmetic procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41125817What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.