ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026
Divergent sensory transcriptomic profiles in positive and negative learning in Bicyclus Anynana butterflies.
Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mate preference learning, where individuals learn to prefer or avoid specific phenotypes during mate selection, is pervasive across animal taxa and influences reproductive isolation and trait evolution. Despite its significance, the genetic basis underlying the associated valence attribution (whether to prefer or avoid) remains largely unclear. Both in terms of what genes are associated with attributing valence, and whether valence attribution is associated with transcriptional changes in both sensory tissues and neural circuits in the brain, or is restricted to the brain. Here, we investigate the neurogenomic basis of positive and negative mate preference learning using Bicyclus anynana butterflies. We put females in positive or negative training scenarios, as well as a naïve control, and compared their transcriptomic profiles across three tissues: antennae, eyes, and brain using RNA-sequencing. Our results reveal tissue-specific transcriptional responses, with the antennae showing higher transcriptomic changes during negative training and the eyes showing higher transcriptomic changes during positive training, relative to the naïve control, indicating that valence attribution during learning may not be restricted to transcriptional changes in the brain. We identified a subset of genes in each tissue whose expression patterns changed with valence, as well as genes previously linked to classical conditioning pathways, supporting the hypothesis that imprinting-like learning and classical conditioning share molecular mechanisms. Our findings suggest that valence attribution in mate preference learning involves tissue-specific transcriptional responses in sensory and brain tissues, emphasising the role of peripheral sensory systems in modulating learned mate preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.