SynthesisEye (London, England)2025
What is the quality-of-life status of patients with keratoconus who have not had a surgical intervention? A systematic review.
Synthesis in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Contact Lenses and Vision-Related Quality of Life: Evidence and Clinical Insights.Clinical optometry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim was to assess the overall quality of life (QoL) of keratoconic patients who had not undergone surgical interventions by evaluating domain scores such as symptoms, activity limitation, psychological changes, mental health and social wellbeing. The search strategy was conducted using five different search platforms (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Emcare, CINAHL). We included prospective or retrospective studies assessing the quality of life of patients with keratoconus who have not had a surgical intervention to manage their keratoconus. Data collected were assessed according to their psychometric properties, validity, reliability and responsiveness. Articles were screened for suitability and data were extracted. Bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB2.0 tool and ROBIN - I tool. Six hundred and thirty one results were yielded from the searches and a total of 70 articles were screened based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A final total of 26 articles were included. Studies had sample sizes ranging from 25 to 1209 participants with keratoconus. The NEI VFQ was the most used tool to evaluate vision-related QoL (VRQoL) being used in 16 studies. Contact lens wear was the most common non-surgical intervention in 13 studies showing improvements in certain domains. The assessment of VRQoL across the studies revealed moderate to significant impairments in several key QoL domains including emotional, social and economic well-being. Patients with keratoconus who have not undergone surgery experienced significant impact on both physical and psychological dimensions. While contact lenses can improve visual function especially in the early stages of the disease but had limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.