ArticleScientific reports2025
EMG hysteresis patterns in human elbow muscles under simultaneous force and length changes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A "thermodynamic" model of synergistic interaction of human elbow flexor muscles during simultaneous change in their length and force.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Central motor commands to human elbow joint muscles during simultaneous changes in their force and length: a preliminary study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated signal transmission in the human motor system, focusing on the influence of coinciding and opposing directions of change in key mechanical parameters - muscle length and force - on electromyograms (EMGs). The goal is to understand how these mechanical changes affect muscle activation during movement, a crucial aspect for developing a comprehensive model of motor control. Eight participants performed movement tests using a robotic-mechatronic device. Each test was repeated ten times to obtain averaged EMG signals from the elbow muscles. The participants developed active elbow flexor contractions while pressing a force vector-measuring manipulator in biofeedback mode. The manipulator's movement trajectory and visual biofeedback were preprogrammed to create time profiles of muscle length and force changes using a double trapezoid waveform. The EMG data were compared for opposing pattern (OP) and coinciding pattern (CP) movements in terms of length and force changes. During OP movements, the averaged EMG waveforms followed programmed force changes, with some natural distortions. However, CP movements strongly compensated for the differences in force and length, reducing EMG variation. Statistical analysis revealed that the amplitude of the force factor did not significantly affect the integrated areas of EMGs or their peak amplitudes, but the directional force factor and interaction of factors were effective. Interestingly, muscle hysteresis effects, where higher EMG activity typically corresponds to muscle shortening, were violated by some agonists but preserved by others. This study highlights the complex mechanical interactions and redistribution of forces among synergistic muscles during different movement patterns. These findings may help refine the "thermodynamic" model of muscle activation, providing insights into how central commands are modulated during motor tasks involving both coinciding and opposing mechanical changes in muscle length and force.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.