Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41125742›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Lifestyle data-based multiclass obesity prediction with interpretable ensemble models incorporating SHAP and LIME analysis.

Shahid Mohammad Ganie, Pijush Kanti Dutta Pramanik, Zhongming Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shahid Mohammad Ganie *Department of Health Information Management and Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Pijush Kanti Dutta Pramanik *School of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, 203201, Uttar Pradesh, India. pijushjld@yahoo.co.in.
Zhongming ZhaoCenter for Precision Health, McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA. zhongming.zhao@uth.tmc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a major public health concern. Predicting obesity risk from lifestyle data can guide targeted interventions, but current models remain limited. This study first evaluates ensemble learning methods and then combines approaches to improve prediction accuracy and generalizability. Four ensemble techniques-boosting, bagging, stacking, and voting-were tested. Five boosting and five bagging models were constructed alongside voting and stacking models. Hyperparameter tuning optimized performance, and feature importance analysis guided potential feature elemination. In phase two, hybrid stacking and voting models integrated the best-performing boosting and bagging models to enhance predictive capability. Model robustness was ensured through k-fold cross-validation and statistical validation. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) improved interpretability by analyzing feature contributions. Hybrid stacking and voting models outperformed other ensemble methods, with stacking achieving the best performance (accuracy: 96.88%, precision: 97.01%, and recall: 96.88%). Feature importance analysis identified key predictors, including sex, weight, food habits, and alcohol consumption. The results demonstrated that hybrid ensembles significantly improved obesity risk prediction while preserving interpretability. Integrating multiple ensemble and explainability techniques provides a reliable framework for obesity prediction, supporting clinical decisions and personalized healthcare strategies to mitigate obesity risk.

Indexed as

Life StyleObesityAdultFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleRisk FactorsBoosting, bagging, stacking, votingEnsemble learningFriedman’s rank analysisLIMEObesity predictionPost hoc analysisSHAPXAI

Identifiers

PMID41125742
PMCPMC12546719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.