Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41125713›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Multicenter randomized trial assessing efficacy and safety of aerosolized dornase Alfa in COVID-19 ARDS.

Charles Gregoire, Lucas Di Meglio, Chloé Le Cossec, Benoit Ho-Tin-Noé, Mialitiana Solo Nomenjanahary, Jessica Guillaume, Mylène Hamdani, Marie-Reine Losser, Fabien Lambiotte, Serge Le Tacon and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04355364 (Efficacy and Safety of Dornase Alfa Aerosol in ARDS Secondary to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Respiratory Infection - COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04355364 phase3terminatednot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of Dornase Alfa Aerosol in ARDS Secondary to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Respiratory Infection - COVID-19

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de RothschildRan2020 to 2021Enrolled77ConditionsCOVID-19, Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeArmsDornase Alfa Inhalation Solution [Pulmozyme], standard procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Charles Gregoire *Intensive Care Department, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 25-29 Rue Manin, 75019, Paris, France. charles.gregoire@gmail.com.
Lucas Di Meglio *Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropharmacologie OTEN U1144, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, 75006, Paris, France.
Chloé Le CossecClinical Research Unit, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.
Benoit Ho-Tin-NoéOptimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropharmacologie OTEN U1144, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, 75006, Paris, France.
Mialitiana Solo NomenjanaharyOptimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropharmacologie OTEN U1144, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, 75006, Paris, France.
Jessica GuillaumeClinical Research Unit, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.
Mylène HamdaniInterventional Neuroradiology Department, Biological Resource Center, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.
Marie-Reine LosserService d'Anesthésie- Réanimation Brabois Adulte, CHRU-Nancy, Inserm DCAC, Université de Lorraine, 54000, Nancy, France.
Fabien LambiotteService de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes, Avenue Désandrouin, 59322, Valenciennes, France.
Serge Le TaconService de Réanimation Polyvalente, CHR Metz-Thionville-Site de Mercy, 1 Allée du Château, 57350, Ars-Laquenexy, France.
Marie CantierIntensive Care Department, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 25-29 Rue Manin, 75019, Paris, France.
Nicolas EngrandIntensive Care Department, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 25-29 Rue Manin, 75019, Paris, France.
Amélie YavchitzClinical Research Unit, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.
Pierre TrouillerIntensive Care Department, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 25-29 Rue Manin, 75019, Paris, France.
Jean-Philippe Desilles *Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropharmacologie OTEN U1144, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, 75006, Paris, France.
Julien Pottecher *Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Périopératoire, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Hôpital de Hautepierre, 1 Avenue Molière, 67098, Strasbourg, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with high mortality rates and respiratory compromise in which excessive neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) production may amplify alveolar inflammation and injury. Dornase alfa, a recombinant DNAse 1, has been proposed to attenuate these effects by degrading extracellular DNA and enhancing alveolar clearance of NETs. In this multicenter, open-label, randomized in two parallel arms (1:1) controlled trial, intubated COVID-19 ARDS patients received either standard-of-care (SOC) alone or SOC plus aerosolized dornase alfa (2500 IU twice daily for 7 days). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ARDS severity improvement at Day 7, defined by at least one-grade improvement on the Berlin criteria scale. Secondary outcomes included 28-day mortality, ventilator-free days, ICU-free days, and changes in key ventilatory parameters. Biological samples were analyzed to assess NET related markers, DNAse drug activity and indicate possible bioavailability issues associated with aerosolization of dornase alfa. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled (dornase alfa group, n = 39; SOC group, n = 38). At Day 7, ARDS severity improved in 18% of patients receiving dornase alfa compared with 29% in the SOC group (adjusted OR: 0.33; 95% CI 0.09-1.14; p = 0.11). Secondary endpoints, including 28-day mortality, ventilator-free days, and ICU-free days, showed no significant differences between groups. Adverse events occurred in 38.5% of patients in the dornase alfa arm versus 31.6% in the SOC arm, indicating comparable safety profiles. Despite early increases in NET plasmatic levels observed in both groups and successful ex vivo NET degradation, aerosolized dornase alfa failed to significantly enhance DNAse activity or reduce NET-related markers in patients' plasma and mucus, suggesting potential bioavailability limitations with this delivery method. In patients with COVID-19-related ARDS, dornase alfa did neither significantly reduce ARDS severity nor improve clinical outcomes over SOC. Although well tolerated, analysis of biological samples suggests that aerosol administration may have compromised drug bioavailability. Further trials are needed to determine whether specific patient subgroups could benefit more from dornase alfa or if alternative drug delivery methods might enhance treatment efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04355364. Registered on 21/04/2020.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentDeoxyribonuclease IRespiratory Distress SyndromeAdministration, InhalationAdultAerosolsAgedExtracellular TrapsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecombinant ProteinsSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAerosolsDeoxyribonuclease Idornase alfaRecombinant ProteinsARDSCOVID-19DNAse 1InflammationNeutrophil extracellular traps

Identifiers

PMID41125713
PMCPMC12546865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.