ArticleScientific reports2025
Determinants of the adoption of an online community for people with diabetes: a qualitative study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores user experiences of CompARTE Diabetes, a nurse-moderated online peer support community, to identify factors influencing its adoption using the Non-adoption, Abandoning, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework. A qualitative descriptive design was employed through semi-structured interviews with 15 adult users (33.3% women; aged 19-65, M = 42.3) conducted between November and December 2024. Participants were purposively selected and met inclusion criteria. Data were thematically analysed using a deductive approach aligned with the NASSS, supported by inductive coding. Adoption was facilitated by a user-friendly interface, mobile app functionality, and attractive design. Nurse moderation was pivotal in fostering trust, curbing misinformation, and promoting meaningful discussion. Participants highlighted the value of innovative content, gamification, and hybrid (online/offline) interactions. Peer support reduced isolation, improved emotional well-being, and enhanced self-care. Barriers included technical difficulties, limited time, stigma, and challenges in integrating diabetes management into daily life. In conclusion, moderated virtual communities such as CompARTE Diabetes offer emotional, educational, and practical support for people with diabetes. Their success depends on overcoming digital divides, maintaining professional moderation, and fostering user engagement to enhance chronic illness self-management. Future studies should explore the long-term effects on clinical outcomes and assess strategies to enhance inclusivity across diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.