ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting visual aesthetic preferences in Tehran city universities campuses using machine learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual aesthetic preferences fundamentally shape the restorative potential of university landscapes and have a significant impact on student well-being and engagement. This study developed Ensemble Learning Models to predict students' aesthetic preferences for interactive rest spots and compared their accuracy with conventional individual models. The input dataset (18 features) was extracted from images of 100 student rest spots across four universities campuses in Tehran city: University of Tehran, Amirkabir University of Technology, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, and Tarbiat Modares University. Based on the aesthetic preferences reported by 394 university students, the study employed Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and their combinations of SVR-MLP and SVR-RF-MLP to predict the aesthetic quality on university campuses. The results show that Ensemble Learning Models outperform individual models in predicting students' aesthetic preferences, filling a key research gap. The individual models demonstrated varying levels of accuracy across the total dataset, with SVR (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.