Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41125668›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Image complexity-based fMRI-BOLD visual network categorization across visual datasets using topological descriptors and deep-hybrid learning.

Debanjali Bhattacharya, Neelam Sinha, R Yashwanth, Amit Chattopadhyay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Debanjali BhattacharyaDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Amrita School of Artificial Intelligence, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Bengaluru, 560035, India. b_debanjali@blr.amrita.edu.
Neelam SinhaCenter for Brain Research, Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore, 560012, India. neelam@cbr-iisc.ac.in.
R YashwanthInternational Institute of Information Technology (IIIT), Bangalore, 560100, India.
Amit ChattopadhyayInternational Institute of Information Technology (IIIT), Bangalore, 560100, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study proposes a new approach that investigates differences in topological characteristics of visual networks, which are constructed using fMRI BOLD time-series corresponding to visual datasets of COCO, ImageNet, and SUN. A publicly available BOLD5000 dataset is utilized that contains fMRI scans while viewing 5254 images of diverse complexities. The objective of this study is to examine how network topology differs in response to distinct visual stimuli from these visual datasets. To achieve this, 0- and 1-dimensional persistence diagrams are computed for each visual network representing COCO, ImageNet, and SUN. For extracting suitable features from topological persistence diagrams, K-means clustering is executed. The extracted K-means cluster features are fed to a novel deep-hybrid model that yields accuracy in the range of 90-95% in classifying these visual networks. To understand vision, this type of visual network categorization across visual datasets is important as it captures differences in BOLD signals while perceiving images with different contexts and complexities. Furthermore, distinctive topological patterns of visual network associated with each dataset, as revealed from this study, could potentially lead to the development of future neuroimaging biomarkers for diagnosing visual processing disorders like visual agnosia or prosopagnosia, and tracking changes in visual cognition over time.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingVisual PerceptionBrain MappingHumansClassificationDeep hybrid learningFMRI time-seriesPartial correlationTopological data analysisVisual network

Identifiers

PMID41125668
PMCPMC12546827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.