ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on the similarity calculation of short text in the terminology domain based on siamese BERT model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computation of sentence similarity score through hybrid deep learning with a special focus on negation sentence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Learning semantic similarity from sentence pairs using hybrid features centric approach and explainable siamese neural networks.PloS one · 2026Article
- A study on an enhanced method for joint extraction of control intent and navigation information for smart city airport operations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study focuses on the task of term-domain short-text similarity computation. It addresses two main challenges: dataset scarcity and insufficient deep semantic extraction. To solve these issues, we first construct the multi-domain Terminology Definition Similarity (TDS) dataset using an automated pipeline. This pipeline combines data generation (based on the GPT-4 model) with a manual verification process involving expert quality control. The design ensures the production of high-quality data. We then present an innovative model named SDQKC (Sbert + dynamic QK + contrast). The model optimizes the Siamese BERT network through a dynamic QK co-attention mechanism and enhances its deep-level semantic understanding by incorporating contrastive learning. Experimental results show that the SDQKC model achieves Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.69384 on the BQ Corpus (Bank Question Corpus) and 0.69511 on the TDS dataset. These results significantly outperform other baseline models, demonstrating the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.