Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41125660›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Examining the impact of augmented reality on students' learning outcomes.

Xin Tian, Chinaza Solomon Ironsi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xin TianInternational Chinese Teaching & Research Center, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Chinaza Solomon IronsiSchool of Education, African Development University, Niamey, Niger. solomon.chinaza@akun.edu.tr.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Education Science Planning Project:"Innovation and Practice of International Chinese Language Teachers' Progressive Training Model Empowered by Intelligent Technology CIAA23045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates student and teacher perceptions of using augmented reality (AR) in the classroom and evaluates AR's impact on student cognition and academic performance. Research on its use for educational purposes is at the cradle stage, requiring more investigations. To provide more insights into the efficacy of AR in improving students' learning outcomes, this study utilized a mixed-method research methodology to collect data from 88 participants. The researchers gathered and assessed data to examine the participants' viewpoints on utilizing augmented reality. The study's findings indicate that while research affirms the efficacy of augmented reality (AR) in enhancing students' learning experiences, both students and teachers acknowledged the presence of several pitfalls. Nonetheless, this study suggests that using augmented reality (AR) may result in positive learning outcomes.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityLearningStudentsAcademic PerformanceAdolescentAdultCognitionFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAugmented realityEducationEducation technologyInstructional delivery

Identifiers

PMID41125660
PMCPMC12546606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.