ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessment of macroscopic properties of ecological building materials based on chemical microscopic phase composition and interface interaction mechanisms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the macroscopic properties of ecological building materials prepared from recycled industrial waste through comprehensive analysis of chemical microscopic phase composition and interface interaction mechanisms. Three primary industrial wastes (fly ash, blast furnace slag, and steel slag) were systematically incorporated as cement replacements at various proportions. Advanced characterization techniques including X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and mercury intrusion porosimetry were employed to establish quantitative relationships between microstructural parameters and macroscopic performance. Results demonstrate that optimized waste incorporation achieves superior mechanical properties, with the optimal combination containing 15% fly ash, 7.5% steel slag, and 22.5% blast furnace slag exhibiting 52.3 MPa compressive strength, representing 16.2% improvement over reference cement. Quantitative phase analysis revealed enhanced C-S-H gel formation (58.2% vs. 54.3%) through pozzolanic reactions, while interfacial transition zone characteristics significantly influenced overall performance. The developed structure-property relationship models achieved correlation coefficients exceeding 0.92 for strength prediction, enabling rational material design optimization. This research provides scientific foundations for waste-derived building material development while contributing to circular economy implementation and environmental sustainability in construction industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.