Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41125647›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Leveraging stable diffusion to reconstruct missing core intervals.

Xin Liu, Umair Bin Waheed, Korhan Ayranci, Ammar J Abdlmutalib

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xin LiuKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia.
Umair Bin WaheedKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia. umair.waheed@kfupm.edu.sa.
Korhan AyranciKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia.
Ammar J AbdlmutalibKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

SDAIA-KFUPM JRCAI-RG-13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Core-based data provide critical insights into subsurface reservoir characterization by offering direct observations of rock formations, including lithology, sedimentary structures, and minerals. However, core analysis is frequently compromised by missing intervals resulting from extraction damage, handling losses, and the common practice of drilling inch-size plugs for laboratory analysis. These gaps create significant interpretation challenges, particularly in heterogeneous formations where spatial continuity is essential for accurate reservoir modeling. Given the high operational costs and strategic value of core data, developing reliable methods for reconstructing missing core sections represents a crucial advancement in reservoir evaluation. This study investigates the application of Stable Diffusion Model (SDM) for core interval/plug reconstruction, building on its proven success in conditioned image inpainting tasks. Through systematic evaluation across diverse depositional environments, we demonstrate SDM's effectiveness in reconstructing homogeneous intervals and gradual facies transition zones, while testing its limitations in handling complex heterogeneous zones with abrupt facies changes. The model shows strengths in restoring sedimentary textures and bedding architectures but faces challenges in accurately predicting the locations of sharp facies boundaries. Our approach enhances the utility of incomplete core images, and the findings along with the proposed potential improvement methods may provide insights for other researchers to further reduce reservoir assessment uncertainties.

Identifiers

PMID41125647
PMCPMC12546600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.