ArticleScientific reports2025
Mass spectrometry combined with machine learning identifies novel protein signatures as demonstrated with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Translational opportunities in aptamer and nanobody lateral flow assays within the WHO REASSURED framework.Sensors & diagnostics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid and accurate diagnosis of emerging inflammatory illnesses is challenging due to overlapping clinical features with existing conditions. We demonstrate an approach that integrates proteomic analysis with machine learning to identify diagnostic protein signatures, using the example of SARS-CoV-2-induced multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). We used plasma samples collected from subjects diagnosed with MIS-C and compared them first to controls with asymptomatic/mild SARS-CoV-2 infection and then to controls with pneumonia or Kawasaki disease. We used mass spectrometry to identify proteins and support vector machine (SVM) algorithm-based classification schemes to identify protein signatures. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC), and corrected for overfitting by cross-validation. Proteomic analysis of a training dataset containing MIS-C (N = 17), and asymptomatic/mild SARS-CoV-2 infected control samples (N = 20) identified 643 proteins, of which 101 were differentially expressed. Plasma proteins associated with inflammation increased, and those associated with metabolism and coagulation decreased in MIS-C relative to controls. The SVM machine learning algorithm identified a three-protein model (ORM1, AZGP1, SERPINA3) that achieved 90.0% specificity, 88.2% sensitivity, and 93.5% AUC, distinguishing MIS-C from controls in the training set. Performance was retained in the validation dataset utilizing MIS-C (N = 19) and asymptomatic/mild SARS-CoV-2 infected control samples (N = 10) (90.0% specificity, 84.2% sensitivity, 87.4% AUC). We next replicated our approach to compare MIS-C with similarly presenting syndromes, such as pneumonia (N = 17) and Kawasaki disease (N = 13), and found a distinct three-protein signature (VWF, FCGBP, and SERPINA3) that accurately distinguished MIS-C from the other conditions (97.5% specificity, 89.5% sensitivity, 95.6% AUC). A software tool was also developed that may be used to evaluate other protein signatures using our data. These results demonstrate that the use of mass spectrometry to identify candidate plasma proteins followed by machine learning, specifically SVM, is an efficient strategy for identifying and evaluating biomarker signatures for disease classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.