Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41125638›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

Clean technology cost projections: investment and levelized costs of solar, wind, battery, and hydrogen.

Hadi Vatankhah Ghadim, Jannik Haas, Christian Breyer, Hans Christian Gils, Philip Odonkor, E Grant Read, Mengzhu Xiao, Rebecca Peer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hadi Vatankhah GhadimSustainable Energy Research Group (SERG), Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Ōtautahi Christchurch, Aotearoa, New Zealand. hadi.vatankhahghadim@pg.canterbury.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3803-0072
Jannik HaasSustainable Energy Research Group (SERG), Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Ōtautahi Christchurch, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Christian BreyerSchool of Energy Systems, LUT University, 53850, Lappeenranta, Finland.
Hans Christian GilsGerman Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Networked Energy Systems, Curiestraße 4, 70563, Stuttgart, Germany.
Philip OdonkorDepartment of Systems and Enterprises, Charles V. Schaefer, Jr. School of Engineering and Science, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, 07030, USA.
E Grant ReadSustainable Energy Research Group (SERG), Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Ōtautahi Christchurch, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Mengzhu XiaoInternational Renewable Energy Agency, Innovation and Technology Center, Willy-Brandt-Allee 20, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
Rebecca PeerSustainable Energy Research Group (SERG), Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Ōtautahi Christchurch, Aotearoa, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9951-2625

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable cost projection data is critical for energy system modelling, guiding policy and investment decisions that underpin the global energy transition. In this work, we compile and standardise a broad dataset from over 110 existing regional and global studies to provide an organised and spatio-temporally granular dataset of cost projections for major clean energy technologies. The dataset covers Capital Expenditures (CAPEX) and Levelised Costs of Electricity or Hydrogen (LCOE or LCOH) for utility-scale and rooftop photovoltaics, onshore and offshore wind power, grid-scale Li-ion batteries, concentrated solar thermal power, and large-scale alkaline and PEM electrolysers. The data span national, continental, and global scales, with annual granularity through 2050 and metadata for source type and region. Values under various scenarios are provided to enable risk and uncertainty assessments. This resource supports scenario modelling, investment planning, policy design, and benchmarking in the context of decarbonisation pathways. While the data are drawn entirely from existing sources, the novelty lies in the structured harmonisation, metadata processing, and comprehensive coverage, making it suitable for techno-economic evaluation and robust energy system modelling.

Identifiers

PMID41125638
PMCPMC12546615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.