ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a self-management intervention for adolescents living with HIV in Namibia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescents living with HIV face significant challenges, including poor treatment adherence and increased morbidity. To address their unique self-management needs, this study developed and validated a self-management intervention for adolescents living with HIV in Namibia. A mixed-methods approach was employed at five Antiretroviral Clinics in northeastern Namibia. The intervention prototype was collaboratively developed with seven adolescents, two nurse practitioners, and one doctor, underpinned by Social Cognitive Theory. Content validation was conducted through focus group discussions with ten local stakeholders, who used a four-point Likert scale to evaluate the relevance of the session content. Both quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed to refine the intervention. Stakeholders rated the initial session content as highly relevant (62.5% average score on the Likert scale). The validation process led to collaborative changes, including a greater focus on coping strategies for managing stigma and anxiety. Participants also recommended adding practical skills such as medication adherence techniques, goal setting, and communication strategies. The final product is a six-session intervention designed to empower adolescents through skill-building and peer support. This study demonstrates that a structured collaborative framework is effective for developing and validating interventions tailored for adolescents living with HIV. Further testing is needed to assess the intervention's effectiveness in real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.