ArticleScientific reports2025
Computational discovery of BRD4 inhibitors for neuroblastoma therapy using pharmacophore screening and molecular simulations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BRD4 ("Bromodomain-containing protein 4"), a recognized gene regulator, is an attractive target for therapeutic development, particularly for the management of neuroblastoma. An integrated pharmacoinformatic strategy for the development of new BRD4 inhibitors is examined in this research. Pharmacophores were used to digitally screen five databases, and the current study aims to determine the best binding modes by docking the screened hits to the BRD4 active site. Using the BRD4 protein co-crystal ligand (73B) (PDB ID: 4BJX) as a template, pharmacophore hypotheses were produced. Five databases were subjected to a pharmacophore-based virtual screening process, and 1089 hits that satisfied the screening requirements were selected for docking against the BRD4 receptor by using the SP module of the Glide tool. The top ten docked compounds with the highest binding affinities, ranging from - 9.623 to - 8.894 kcal/mol, were selected. Further, the biological activity and ADMET analysis revealed that the selected compounds have values that fall in the acceptable range. The protein-ligand complexes' stability was verified by performing molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the binding positions of the top two compounds against the BRD4 receptor. The stability and binding free energies of the compounds indicate that these compounds may function as lead compounds to affect the biological activity of BRD4 in the in vitro studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.