ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting self-healing efficiency in recycled aggregate concrete using optimized machine learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Self-healing concrete can repair microcracks and enhance durability, but traditional methods are costly and complex. Using recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) as a substitute for natural aggregates can reduce costs, improve self-healing properties, and support sustainable construction. This study applied machine learning (ML) to predict the impact of RCA on concrete's self-healing performance. A database of 173 datasets was established, with eight key indicators as input variables and the self-healing rate as the output. An optimized NRBO-XGBoost model was developed and compared with four ML models and two optimization methods. The NRBO-XGBoost model outperformed all others, achieving the highest accuracy (R² = 0.9569, RMSE = 7.1800, MAE = 4.9575). Sensitivity analysis using the Shapley method identified crack width as the most influential factor in self-healing performance, while RCA had minimal impact within the studied range. However, RCA's low cost and environmental benefits highlight its potential for practical applications. This study provides theoretical insights into self-healing recycled concrete and introduces an optimized ML approach for performance prediction. The findings offer valuable guidance for sustainable construction practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.