Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41125623›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Predicting self-healing efficiency in recycled aggregate concrete using optimized machine learning models.

Kunpeng Cao, Dunwen Liu, Kian Hau Kong, Wanmao Zhang, Yu Tang, Yinghua Jian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kunpeng CaoSchool of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China.
Dunwen LiuSchool of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China. 225501007@csu.edu.com.
Kian Hau KongDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117576, Singapore.
Wanmao ZhangSchool of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China.
Yu TangSchool of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China.
Yinghua JianSchool of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China.

Funding

postdoctoral research of Central South University 228697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-healing concrete can repair microcracks and enhance durability, but traditional methods are costly and complex. Using recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) as a substitute for natural aggregates can reduce costs, improve self-healing properties, and support sustainable construction. This study applied machine learning (ML) to predict the impact of RCA on concrete's self-healing performance. A database of 173 datasets was established, with eight key indicators as input variables and the self-healing rate as the output. An optimized NRBO-XGBoost model was developed and compared with four ML models and two optimization methods. The NRBO-XGBoost model outperformed all others, achieving the highest accuracy (R² = 0.9569, RMSE = 7.1800, MAE = 4.9575). Sensitivity analysis using the Shapley method identified crack width as the most influential factor in self-healing performance, while RCA had minimal impact within the studied range. However, RCA's low cost and environmental benefits highlight its potential for practical applications. This study provides theoretical insights into self-healing recycled concrete and introduces an optimized ML approach for performance prediction. The findings offer valuable guidance for sustainable construction practices.

Indexed as

Crack repairMachine learningPredictionRecycled aggregateSelf-healing concrete

Identifiers

PMID41125623
PMCPMC12546734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.