Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41125598›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Task allocation in a cooperative breeder reflects current needs, not early-life experience.

Océane Vanessa Ferreira, Barbara Taborsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Océane Vanessa FerreiraDivision of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. oceane.ferreira@unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8504-9501
Barbara TaborskyDivision of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1690-8155

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 310030_207448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Division of labour is often perceived as one of the major evolutionary transitions in social groups. Specialisation of individuals in different tasks performed in a territory can increase group efficiency in cooperative breeders and eusocial insects. Nevertheless, environmental unpredictability should select for the presence of generalist individuals, which can flexibly perform all tasks in the territory. Whether individuals should develop as specialists or generalists has been intensively studied to understand ecological influences on the evolution of complex societies. Experiences occurring during early life are crucial for the acquisition of appropriate behaviours in a social context. We examined later-life task performance of helpers of the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher, which had received different early life experiences of helping needs. We demonstrated that neither repeated early life experience with the need to defend against a predator, nor the need for territory maintenance influenced current task performance. Instead, the current needs for help, such as for egg care, predator defence, and territory maintenance influenced task performance of helpers. Therefore, our results suggest that prioritising present requirements over early life experiences shapes task distribution among cooperative breeders.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalCichlidsCooperative BehaviorAnimalsFemaleMaleSocial BehaviorCooperative breedingDivision of labourEarly lifeFlexibilityNeolamprologus pulcherTask specialisation

Identifiers

PMID41125598
PMCPMC12546903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.