ArticleJournal of chest surgery2026
Prognostic Significance of Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Who Attained Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy.
Article in Journal of chest surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Commentary: The Emerging Role of Circulating Tumor Cells Beyond Pathological Complete Response in Esophageal Cancer.Journal of chest surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) refers to the absence of residual tumor cells after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and is associated with favorable outcomes. However, 25%-33% of such patients still experience disease recurrence. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) for risk stratification in patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) who achieved pCR following nCRT. Methods: We measured post-nCRT CTC counts in the peripheral blood of patients with EC who attained pCR after undergoing nCRT. The impact of CTC counts on survival was then analyzed, accounting for the potential confounding effects of established clinical and pathological risk factors. Results: The study included 24 patients, of whom 18 (75%) had detectable CTCs. The mean CTC concentration was 5.1 per mL of blood. Univariable Cox regression analysis showed that CTC count was the only independent predictor of disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.113; 95% confidence interval, 1.008-1.229; p=0.034). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined an optimal cutoff value of 4.5 CTCs per mL. The 3-year disease-free survival rate was significantly higher in the low-CTC group (92.9%) than in the high-CTC group (50.0%, p=0.032). Conclusion: In patients with EC who achieve pCR following nCRT, CTC quantification may help identify those at increased risk of poor survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.