ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025
Bias in Visual Short-Term Memory for Motion Induced by Perceptually Suppressed Distractors.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interference between visual short-term memory (VSTM) and task-irrelevant sensory distractors is a well-documented phenomenon across a wide range of visual features. Although this sensory-memory interference is believed to result from neural interactions between mnemonic and sensory processing, the nature of the interfering signals remains unclear, particularly whether the interference originates from physical stimuli entering the retina or the resulting subjective perception. Here we addressed this question by leveraging perceptual invariance during smooth pursuit eye movements, where retinal motion induced by eye movements is perceptually suppressed. Distractors were presented as either physical object motion in world coordinates or apparent motion of a stationary background induced by eye movements, allowing us to generate identical retinal motion with distinct perception. Human observers (both female and male) were tasked with comparing the speeds of two sequentially presented motion stimuli while ignoring the distractor stimuli presented between them. Our results showed that the retinal motion distractor systematically biased the memorized motion speed. Crucially, the magnitude of the bias was comparable regardless of whether the retinal motion distractor reflected physical or apparent motion. Notably, the distraction effect of the eye movement-induced retinal motion was successfully replicated using a classifier trained on data from the physical motion condition. A further experiment confirmed that this distraction effect by the apparent motion was not due to eye movements themselves. These findings provide behavioral evidence that, at least for the feature of motion speed, perception is not required for the emergence of a bias in VSTM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.