ArticleBMJ open gastroenterology2025
Cost of reusable gastrointestinal endoscopes to the NHS: findings from a micro-costing study.
Article in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to quantify the per-procedure costs of acquiring, maintaining/repairing and reprocessing reusable gastrointestinal endoscopes by observing practices in a large National Health Service (NHS) hospital.
methodsWe conducted a bottom-up micro-costing analysis to capture the costs of reusable gastrointestinal endoscopes using a detailed resource-use data sheet and observations at the University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire (UHCW). The data sheet drew on the published literature and NHS decontamination guidance. Cost categories included (1) measuring personnel time for reprocessing endoscopes, (2) reprocessing materials and (3) acquisition and maintenance/repair of endoscopy and reprocessing equipment. Data were obtained through observation and interviews with staff. Costs were calculated using the data collected at UHCW and cross-checked with data from two other NHS Trusts, manufacturers and the literature.
resultsStaff time for reprocessing averaged 35 min per procedure (£23.57: 22% of the total cost). The reprocessing materials' cost per procedure was £16.41 (15% of the total cost). Total capital acquisition cost per procedure was £46.9 (44% of the total cost), including endoscopy capital (£37.4) and reprocessing capital (£9.5). Total maintenance/repair cost per procedure was £20.46 (19% of the total cost). These led to a total cost of £107.34 per endoscopy procedure.
conclusionsSome observed values were slightly lower than but generally comparable to similar studies. We identified the key drivers of costs, led by capital costs. The results of our study could be used in economic evaluations involving reusable gastrointestinal endoscopes. The methodology can inform the cost evaluation of medical devices that require intensive reprocessing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.