ArticleFukushima journal of medical science2026
Participants' characteristics influencing pupillometry parameters in a community in Japan.
Article in Fukushima journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing pupil diameter in individuals of a community in Japan, contributing to a broader understanding of the potential of pupillometry as a non-invasive and reliable health indicator. We used a pupillometry device, "AiLive," developed by Mecara Inc. The participants were recruited during a sports festival (SPORTEC 2023), where Mecara Inc. hosted a booth event. The primary outcomes were pupillometry parameters, including the size of pupil parameters and velocity parameters. We analyzed the association between the primary outcome and participant characteristics, including age, sex, the presence of disease, and medication usage. Significant differences were observed between pupillometry parameters and age, sex, and having cataracts, notably pupil size parameters, while velocity parameters remained consistent across groups. These results highlight that the size of pupil parameters could be under-adjusted for age, sex, and the presence of cataracts;in contrast, velocity parameters might have potential as a diagnostic support tool without any adjustment of participants' characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.