Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41125281›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Evaluating home-based personalised virtual reality physiotherapy rehabilitation compared with usual care in the treatment of pain for people with knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a randomised feasibility study.

Mohammad Al-Amri, Samuel Bird, Denise-Teodora Nistor, Judith White, Kate Button, Martin Warner, David Walsh, Dione Shorten, Rose Evans

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06639867 (A Randomised Feasibility Study to Evaluate Home-based Personalised Virtual Reality Physiotherapy Rehabilitation Compared to Usual Care in the Treatment of Pain for People With Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06639867 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

A Randomised Feasibility Study to Evaluate Home-based Personalised Virtual Reality Physiotherapy Rehabilitation Compared to Usual Care in the Treatment of Pain for People With Knee Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorCardiff UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsVR-based home physiotherapy, Standard physiotherapy care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohammad Al-AmriCardiff University School of Healthcare Studies, Cardiff, UK.
Samuel BirdCardiff University School of Healthcare Studies, Cardiff, UK samuel.bird2@wales.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9192-1822
Denise-Teodora NistorCardiff University School of Healthcare Studies, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0457-6216
Judith WhiteCEDAR (Centre for Healthcare Evaluation, Device Assessment, and Research), Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Kate ButtonCardiff University School of Healthcare Studies, Cardiff, UK.
Martin WarnerSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, Southampton, UK.
David WalshAcademic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nottingham, UK.
Dione ShortenCardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Rose EvansPhysiotherapy, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHome-based physiotherapy is a current approach to manage knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, adherence to physiotherapy is poor. Non-immersive virtual reality (VR) has shown promise in improving self-efficacy and adherence in other clinical conditions. A non-immersive VR-based home physiotherapy system named Sensor-based Physiotherapy Intervention with Virtual Reality (SPIN-VR) for knee OA has been developed, integrating physiotherapy exercises into engaging games that adjust in difficulty based on real-time performance. This approach aims to enhance exercise adherence by making physiotherapy more enjoyable and personalised. To evaluate the feasibility of this intervention, a randomised controlled trial is being conducted. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: This single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled feasibility trial will evaluate the SPIN-VR system over 12 weeks compared with usual care physiotherapy for knee OA. 50 participants will be randomly assigned to either the SPIN-VR or usual care group, with follow-ups at 12 and 24 weeks post randomisation. The primary outcomes will be a description of feasibility of recruitment, patient willingness to be randomised, the completeness of outcome measures and patient adherence to the intervention. Secondary outcomes include evaluations of muscle strength, endurance, aerobic capacity, exercise technique, central pain processing and self-reported pain mechanisms and moderators. Participants in the intervention arm will be interviewed after 12 weeks to capture their experience in using the VR system. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was approved by the Wales Research Ethics Committee 3. Research findings will be disseminated in open-access peer-reviewed journals, to researchers and health professionals through conference presentations, to patients and the public by organising webinars and a seminar. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06639867.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesOsteoarthritis, KneePhysical Therapy ModalitiesVirtual RealityVirtual Reality Exposure TherapyExercise TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePatient ComplianceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicClinical TrialExerciseFeasibility StudiesKneePain managementRehabilitation medicine

Identifiers

PMID41125281
PMCPMC12548606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.