ArticleBMJ open2025
Association between air pollution-cold wave sequential events and ischaemic stroke incidence among elderly adults in Tianjin, China: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBoth air pollution and temperature variability (with cold wave as an extreme form) may influence the incidence of ischaemic stroke (IS). This study aimed to examine the association between winter air pollution-cold wave sequential events (persistent air pollution followed by cold waves) and IS incidence among adults aged>=60 years.
methodsClinical data were sourced from the Tianjin Medical and Health Big Data Platform (covering 81 secondary/tertiary hospitals), and meteorological/air quality data were sourced from the National Meteorological Science Data Centre. Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to assess the relationships between meteorological variables (eg, 24-hour temperature decrease), atmospheric pollutants (including Air Quality Index (AQI)) and elderly IS incidence. A distributed lag nonlinear model (DLNM) was applied to analyse lagged effects of winter air pollution and cold wave sequential events on IS incidence, while a generalised additive model (GAM) was used to evaluate additive interactions between air pollution and cold waves on IS incidence.
resultsThe study included 109 513 adults aged >=60 years with first-onset IS from 2016 to 2019. Eight winter air pollution-cold wave sequential events were identified over 4 years, with higher daily IS incidence during event periods (67 new cases/day), lag periods (68 new cases/day) than non-event periods (60 new cases/day). Subgroup analysis showed that among adults aged ≥80 years, proportional incidence during both events (80 to 85 years old: 1.89, 95% CI 0.52 to 3.26; 85 to 90 years old: 1.96, 95% CI 0.59 to 3.33) and lag period (80 to 85 years old: 0.90, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.78; 85 to 90 years old: 1.52, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.40) increased compared with the non-event period. Daily IS incidence was positively correlated with 24-hour temperature decreases, AQI and other air pollutants. DLNM showed that lag effects emerged 4 days post-exposure, with the highest IS risk at a 9-day lag (RR=1.122, 95% CI 0.443 to 2.838). GAM confirmed positive additive interactions between air pollution and cold waves on IS incidence (p<0.001).
conclusionWinter air pollution-cold wave sequential events exert a synergistic, lagged effect on IS incidence in the elderly, with adults >=80 years being the most vulnerable. The observed risk patterns and underlying mechanisms underscore the importance of integrated environmental and public health strategies to reduce IS burden in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.