ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025
Scaling success: parental perceptions of the benefits of a 20-week football living-lab approach for children living with cerebral palsy.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundLiving-lab approaches have effectively connected academic research with community needs but have not yet been applied to promote physical activity for children with cerebral palsy (CP). This study evaluated a 20-week football-based living-lab programme for children aged 5-10 years with CP, grounded in the principles of Football is Medicine and physical literacy.
methodsA qualitative design was employed, involving seven one-to-one semistructured interviews with parents or legal guardians of programme participants. A deductive thematic analysis was conducted, and pen profile diagrams were developed to represent key themes related to physical literacy outcomes.
resultsParents reported benefits across multiple dimensions of their children's physical literacy, including improved competence, confidence, motivation and enjoyment. All parents observed enhanced social interaction. Six described the sessions as inclusive and community-oriented, while five felt the programme was personalised to their child's needs. Three parents perceived the football activities as complementary to physical therapy, supporting physical rehabilitation. Participation also enabled parents to exchange strategies and engage more meaningfully in their child's well-being.
conclusionThe football-based living-lab supported the holistic development of children with CP, enhancing physical, psychological and social domains of physical literacy. Parental involvement further reinforced perceived therapeutic and community benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.