ArticleAnnals of coloproctology2025
Efficacy and safety of novel alginate-based sealants (SEAL-G and SEAL-G MIST) in reducing anastomotic leakage following colorectal anastomosis: a prospective multicenter study.
Article in Annals of coloproctology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04532515 (Seal-G and Seal-G MIST Study for Reinforcement and Protection of Colonic Anastomoses in Subjects Undergoing Colonic Resection), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Seal-G and Seal-G MIST Study for Reinforcement and Protection of Colonic Anastomoses in Subjects Undergoing Colonic Resection
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, usability, and safety of the novel alginate-based sealants SEAL-G and SEAL-G MIST in reducing anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection.
methodsThis prospective, multicenter study enrolled 160 patients undergoing elective colonic resection with primary anastomosis at 8 centers. SEAL-G was applied in open procedures (n=33), and SEAL-G MIST was used for minimally invasive procedures (n=127), with both sealants applied circumferentially to the anastomotic site. The primary endpoints included the rate of anastomotic coverage and the incidence of leakage within 30 days, classified according to the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISGRC) criteria.
resultsThe overall anastomotic leak rate was 3.1% (5 of 160), with only 1 patient (0.6%) experiencing a grade C leak that required reoperation. Four patients (2.5%) developed grade A or B leaks, all of which were managed conservatively. Complete circumferential sealant coverage was achieved in 93.1% of cases. The overall leak rates were 6.1 percent and 2.4 percent, respectively. However, statistical analysis did not show a significant difference. Mean hospital stay was significantly shorter after laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery (5.1±2.8 days vs. 8.4±5.5 days, P<0.001).
conclusionAlginate-based sealants show promise in reducing the severity of anastomotic leaks and in supporting anastomotic healing, demonstrating high technical success and low complication rates. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov iden-tifier: NCT04532515.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.