ArticleJournal of proteome research2025
Considering Measurement Time and Depth in diaPASEF Plasma Proteomics.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Carafe2 enables high qualitybioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mass spectrometry (MS)-based plasma proteomics is a powerful approach to unraveling the biology or pathophysiology in large clinical cohorts. Implementation of data-independent acquisition in combination with ion mobility approaches (diaPASEF) has enabled high-throughput analysis with increasing proteomic depth. DIA-based methods are dependent upon experimental or in-silico-generated spectral libraries, yet there is a lack of consensus in the field about which library produces superior results in regard to protein and peptide identifications and quantifications. Here, we evaluated approaches for building a spectral library in plasma proteomics on a timsTOF HT system. Furthermore, the relationship between measurement time, library depth, and number of protein and peptide identification for high-throughput plasma proteomics applications was assessed. As expected, an increase in the measurement time invested in the spectral library enhanced the number of identifications. At the protein level, in silico libraries provided decreased depth compared to the most extensive experimental library. However, the experimental library enhanced the number of peptide identifications by 14% compared to that of the in silico library. With the field increasingly moving to peptide-centric approaches, an experimental library allows for deeper assessment in peptide-based studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.