ArticleEndoscopy2026
Intraductal cryobiopsy via percutaneous cholangioscopy for biliary strictures: a multicenter feasibility study.
Article in Endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Tissue diagnosis of biliary strictures is challenging and often requires multiple methods. Cryobiopsy, which is well established in bronchoscopy with high tissue yield, is presented here for the first time as a proof-of-principle feasibility study performed via the percutaneous route for biliary strictures. Methods: Patients undergoing percutaneous cholangioscopy for intraductal diagnosis of biliary strictures underwent six forceps biopsies and three cryobiopsies in a randomized order. The main objective was to assess feasibility, defined as the retrieval of at least one adequate sample per method per patient. Results: Among 15 patients (53% women; mean age 60.2 years), all had at least one adequate sample obtained by each method. Cryobiopsy yielded significantly larger (8.54 vs. 1.87 mm2; P < 0.001) and more representative specimens (97.6% vs. 74.7%; P = 0.001). It also scored higher on overall histologic quality on a Likert scale of 0–6 (5 vs. 4; P < 0.001) and had more artifact-free areas (93.5% vs. 85.5%; P = 0.01). No bleeding or perforations occurred; only minor adverse events were reported and these resolved with standard treatment. Conclusions: This feasibility study showed that intraductal cryobiopsy via percutaneous cholangioscopy yielded larger samples and may enable more detailed histologic assessment than forceps biopsies. Further studies will evaluate its accuracy, safety, and potential for use with peroral cholangioscopy during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.