ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Global Adoption, Promotion, Impact, and Deployment of AI in Patient Care, Health Care Delivery, Management, and Health Care Systems Leadership: Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perception and challenges of artificial intelligence (AI) in Emergency Medicine: A multi-country study in Sub-Saharan Africa.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026Article
- Article
- A web-based self-assessment tool for root caries in older adults: development, validation, and transformation of the Root-caries Assessment Nomogram (RAN).BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Adoption, Adaptation, Assimilation, and Use in the United States.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Smart Devices in Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2026Article
- Perceived Barriers, Supportive-Care Integration, and Readiness for AI Integration in Oncology Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Cancer Care Providers in Saudi Arabia.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- ETHICS of AI Adoption and Deployment in Health Care: Progress, Challenges, and Next Steps.JMIR AI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into health care, offering a wide array of benefits. Current AI applications encompass patients' diagnosis, treatment, data mining, and more to enhance patient care and quality of life. It is also democratizing access to expert support by providing timely and accurate disease diagnoses, better clinical management, quicker drug discovery, improved disease prevention, big data management, and health protection.
objectiveThe aim of the study is to document AI adoption in health care, assess participants' perception on its usefulness in the management of health care delivery and leadership of health care systems, and identify characteristics of early adopters.
methodsWe conducted a worldwide cross-sectional survey across all 6 inhabited continents using a self-administered questionnaire developed with the Qualtrics electronic data collection tool. This was piloted and reviewed to ensure completeness, accuracy, acceptability, cultural sensitivity, and relevance. Respondents were recruited by individualized email, following identification from professional associations or organizations, professional networks, and social media. Data were analyzed using SPSS (IBM Corp), with results presented as narrative, charts, and tables.
resultsIn total, 506 health care professionals completed the survey. While 92.3% (467/506) of respondents believed that AI has a role in patient care and health care management, only 76.5% (300/392) were willing to support AI adoption and embedding in their organization. Although top managers are mainly responsible for adoption processes, staff training remains low. AI is currently used mostly for diagnosis, patient care, and precision medicine. These uses of AI will continue in the near future, but in different ways. AI adoption was highest in Europe and lowest in Africa. Black or African American people were more likely to support AI adoption than White and Asian people. Poor knowledge of AI, fear of job loss, and resistance to change were the top barriers to AI adoption and embedding.
conclusionsAI use in health is global, but the adoption rate varies by geography and individual characteristics. AI adoption communication by executive health care management is poor, as is the level of training of health care staff. To improve AI adoption, management should improve communication with their teams, provide training on AI to their workers, and help individuals understand how AI works. Barriers such as ethical issues around data ownership and use should be addressed. African organizations should be proactive and invest in AI adoption early, so that they are not left behind in the AI revolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.