Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41124689›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Global Adoption, Promotion, Impact, and Deployment of AI in Patient Care, Health Care Delivery, Management, and Health Care Systems Leadership: Cross-Sectional Survey.

Obinna O Oleribe, Andrew W Taylor-Robinson, Vetty R Agala, Olajide O Sobande, Ricardo Izurieta, Simon D Taylor-Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Perception and challenges of artificial intelligence (AI) in Emergency Medicine: A multi-country study in Sub-Saharan Africa.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Obinna O OleribeCalifornia State University, Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9017-894X
Andrew W Taylor-RobinsonCollege of Health Sciences, VinUniversity, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7342-8348
Vetty R AgalaRivers State Contributory Health Protection Programme, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6045-2645
Olajide O SobandeNigerian Institute of Medical Research Foundation, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9577-8330
Ricardo IzurietaCalifornia State University, Dominguez Hills, Carson, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1256-5896
Simon D Taylor-RobinsonDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8811-1834

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into health care, offering a wide array of benefits. Current AI applications encompass patients' diagnosis, treatment, data mining, and more to enhance patient care and quality of life. It is also democratizing access to expert support by providing timely and accurate disease diagnoses, better clinical management, quicker drug discovery, improved disease prevention, big data management, and health protection.

objectiveThe aim of the study is to document AI adoption in health care, assess participants' perception on its usefulness in the management of health care delivery and leadership of health care systems, and identify characteristics of early adopters.

methodsWe conducted a worldwide cross-sectional survey across all 6 inhabited continents using a self-administered questionnaire developed with the Qualtrics electronic data collection tool. This was piloted and reviewed to ensure completeness, accuracy, acceptability, cultural sensitivity, and relevance. Respondents were recruited by individualized email, following identification from professional associations or organizations, professional networks, and social media. Data were analyzed using SPSS (IBM Corp), with results presented as narrative, charts, and tables.

resultsIn total, 506 health care professionals completed the survey. While 92.3% (467/506) of respondents believed that AI has a role in patient care and health care management, only 76.5% (300/392) were willing to support AI adoption and embedding in their organization. Although top managers are mainly responsible for adoption processes, staff training remains low. AI is currently used mostly for diagnosis, patient care, and precision medicine. These uses of AI will continue in the near future, but in different ways. AI adoption was highest in Europe and lowest in Africa. Black or African American people were more likely to support AI adoption than White and Asian people. Poor knowledge of AI, fear of job loss, and resistance to change were the top barriers to AI adoption and embedding.

conclusionsAI use in health is global, but the adoption rate varies by geography and individual characteristics. AI adoption communication by executive health care management is poor, as is the level of training of health care staff. To improve AI adoption, management should improve communication with their teams, provide training on AI to their workers, and help individuals understand how AI works. Barriers such as ethical issues around data ownership and use should be addressed. African organizations should be proactive and invest in AI adoption early, so that they are not left behind in the AI revolution.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDelivery of Health CareLeadershipPatient CareAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesartificial intelligencehealth care deliveryhealth care systemleadershipmanagementpatient care

Identifiers

PMID41124689
PMCPMC12590044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.